Re: PG 9..5 index performance Q's

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-admin-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ghiureai
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 1:31 PM
To: pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:  PG 9..5 index performance Q's

Hi List,

  running PGSQL 9.5.1 ( EL7) ,
we are seeing a issues with one of our SQL statement getting the wrong 
plan once in a while ( large temp tables being generate, exec time   
takes  > 3 minutes compared with fastes plan < 1 min), we want to undestand why a new/ expensive plan is been used instead of efficient one, there are not data changes on the tables, any tips where to look?
Second , I would like to know if when re-creating one index ( non pk ) on  a large table with already existing indexes, are  All tables statistics  being re-generated? ( there is a way to control persistency of old stats?)

Isabella

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Without seeing execution plans (both: fast and slow) it's hard to tell.
Auto_explain extension can help you catching these plans in PG log.
Your temp tables - are they being analyzed?

Regards,
Igor Neyman 


-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux