idx_scan =0, but idx_blks_read > 0
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Subject
: idx_scan =0, but idx_blks_read > 0
From
: Marc Mamin <M.Mamin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 08:56:22 +0000
Accept-language
: de-DE, en-US
Hello,
(9.4)
I'm not quite sure how to interpret these figures.
Does it means that index blocks get read for maintenance purpose, e.g. after a row update, but the index itself is never used?
Thanks,
Marc Mamin
Prev by Date:
Re: postgres wal sender replication timeout during pg_basebackup
Next by Date:
Re: postgres wal sender replication timeout during pg_basebackup
Previous by thread:
postgres wal sender replication timeout during pg_basebackup
Next by thread:
Postgresql 9.0.23 - checkpoint delays
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[KVM ARM]
[KVM ia64]
[KVM ppc]
[Virtualization Tools]
[Spice Development]
[Libvirt]
[Libvirt Users]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite Questions]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]
