Re: Proper way to restore from a basebackup without the WAL-files?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok, thanks. That was actually what I ended up doing, but I get some warnings in the log. For example:

< 2015-12-15 00:00:58.206 CET ><  ><  >ERROR:  failed to re-find parent key in index “myindex_idx" for deletion target page 101400
..

Is that to be expected? 

Also, will the server be in a state where I can start replication to a slave? (given a fresh backup from the new timeline)


Regards,
Gustav



On Dec 15, 2015, at 6:47 PM, John Scalia <jayknowsunix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If you absolutely must use the pg_basebackup as your source and I'm assuming you have a tarball without any of WAL files, you could expand the tarball into you data directory, and use pg_resetxlog to "fool" the master into starting up. I only say "fool" as it just builds you a blank WAL file which this system can use as its integrity check and properly start.
--
Jay

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Gustav Karlsson <gustav.karlsson@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

What is the proper way start a new master from a basebackup when you do not have the WAL-files?

We are using postgresql 9.4.

Regards,
Gustav Karlsson



--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux