Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Couldn't creation and deletion of a toasted object within the same
> >> transaction do it?
> 
> > I tried and couldn't find a way to cause one to appear.  When a row is
> > created, it has xmax=0 so when it's deleted the xmax can just be set to
> > the deleting xact.  And we don't ever update pg_toast rows, AFAIK.
> 
> Ah, nevermind, brain fade ... I was momentarily confusing this with
> combo CIDs.  Right, there are no updates or row locks taken on toast
> table rows (unless someone were to do one manually?)

Both UPDATE and SELECT FOR UPDATE fail right away:

alvherre=# update pg_toast.pg_toast_16398 set chunk_id = 7 where chunk_id = 5;
ERROR:  cannot change TOAST relation "pg_toast_16398"

alvherre=# select * from pg_toast.pg_toast_16398 for update;
ERROR:  cannot lock rows in TOAST relation "pg_toast_16398"

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux