On Sep 16, 2014 12:52 PM, "Matheus de Oliveira" <matioli.matheus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Jerry Sievers <gsievers19@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> gabrielle <gorthx@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > I'm running 9.1.11 on CentOS. I'm getting several messages like this in my logs:
>> > 2014-09-12 01:44:25.583 PDT,,,30540,,4dbffb0c.7b5b,5,,2014-09-12 01:41:42 PDT,74/868,0,LOG,55P03,"skipping analyze of ""foo"" --- lock not available",,,,,,
>> >
>> > Unfortunately, I have several databases with tables named 'foo'. I was expecting a db name in the log message; can someone explain why it's not there?
>>
>> Fix your log_line_prefix setting to include DB name and then HUP your server.
>
>
> humm... This looks like CVS log, so the database name would be there if it was a backend process, independent of log_line_prefix.
Yep, csv log - which is why I was expecting a db name :)
Although looks like this message came from autovacuum process, and so it won't give you the database name.
>
> Perhaps it should have qualified as dbname.schemaname.tablename just like "automatic vacuum" and "automatic analyze" messages do. One could do a feature request for that.
Thanks! That's the info I was looking for.
gabrielle
