Hi, I don't see any
differences
if you take backup from master or cold from slave, differences are only in conf files. In my environment I'm only doing full backup using pg_backup of master server (it will skip configuration files), create copy of conf. Files and that is. Of cource do recovery test. --
Dubravko Sever Sektor za računalne sustave Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Sveučilišni računski centar (Srce),
www.srce.unizg.hr Dubravko.Sever@xxxxxxx, tel: +385 1 616 5807, fax: +385 1 616 5559 From: pgsql-admin-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Andrey Nikitin
I have a #postgresql setup with master-slave configuration using repmgr. im struggling with taking a consistent snapshot backup (pg_start_backup) of the slave node, this is due the fact that
the slave is in recovery, hence read-only mode.
i need both the master and the slave snapshots to speedup the recovery process (if taken only on 1 node, in case of recovery the slave needs to be rebuild from scratch). any advice of how to
take a consistent snapshot of slave node? (master is no problem).
currently these are the approaches im checking:
1.shutting down slave node and take a cold snapshot backup.
1.
pg_start_backup on master and hopefully it will reflect consistent state on slave (with the WAL shipping) - any confirmation on this one?
2.
stop replication, take hot backup of slave using regular methods and then starting replication again - as far as i tested, not possible because as the replication
is stopped, each node becomes independent and has its own timeline, thus require the nodes to resync in order to function again in master-slave config.
3.
make a switch over before taking the backup - dont like this option, dont think is a correct approach to make a switch-over each time i want to take a backup.
anything i missed? have you implemented it using different methods?
thanks. |