Re: Upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 - master AND slave

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 09:31:16PM -0700, Sergey Konoplev wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Wells Oliver <wellsoliver@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Following up to my earlier post: I have a master and a slave server (using
> > WAL), both 9.1. My 9.2 upgrade process is:
> >
> > 1) stop postgres on both servers
> > 2) run pg_upgrade --link on both servers
> > 3) change ports so 9.2 is on 5432, 9.1 on 5433
> > 4) restart
> >
> > Is this the best way to do it and ensure that the WAL is still being created
> > and the master/slave relationship properly maintained?
> 
> The problem is that after pg_upgrade the system catalog on the servers
> wont match. Therefore you need to rebuild your slave from scratch.
> 
> There were some ideas around rsync [1], however, nobody proved that
> they work appropriately.
> 
> [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20120320204916.GB26163@xxxxxxxxxx

Yes, though there was discussion about this at PGCon 2013 and I plan to
work on this for 9.4.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux