Wojciechowski, Robert (GE Transportation) wrote > [...] there is a database that shows this connect grant to a user that was > known as foo1_userA (oid 3562339547): 3562339547=c/postgres The main user dependent situation is having said user OWNER on a database object. Simply giving a user connect privileges on a database does not make the database dependent upon said user and so removing said user remains possible. Either (or both) a more explicit description or a self-contained test case is needed to figure out if you are simply mis-understanding the situation or if there truly is a bug. The sentence I quoted above leads me to think operator-error. David J. -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/How-was-I-able-to-drop-a-role-even-though-objects-depend-on-it-tp5762049p5762060.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - admin mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
