Hi all,
I have turned vm.overcommit_memory on 1.
It's a pretty much dedicated machine anyway, except for some postgres maintainance scripts I run in python / bash from the server. I have turned vm.overcommit_memory on 1.
cheers,
Bert
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Bert <biertie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
cheers,currently I already lowered the shared_memory value a bit..Hi Tom,Is it wise to disable the oom killer? Or will the server really go down withough postgres doing something about it?
thanks for the tip! it was indeed the oom killer.
BertOn Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bert <biertie@xxxxxxxxx> writes:AFAIK there are only two possible sources of signal 9: a manual kill,
> I'm running the latest postgres version (9.2.3), and today for the first
> time I encountered this:
> 12774 2013-04-02 18:13:10 CEST LOG: server process (PID 28463) was
> terminated by signal 9: Killed
or the Linux kernel's OOM killer. If it's the latter there should be
a concurrent entry in the kernel logfiles about this. If you find one,
suggest reading up on how to disable OOM kills, or at least reconfigure
your system to make them less probable.
regards, tom lane
--
Bert Desmet
0477/305361
--
Bert Desmet
0477/305361