Re: MySQL Blackhole Engine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Nov 6, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Deron wrote:

> Yes,  I can't really find a good use case for it.   I am meeting with some of them in the next few days to find out exactly what they are using it for.  If there is a legitimate use case for this, I will forward that information.
> 
> Thanks for the suggestions.  I will pass this information along as well if they really need the behavior.

>From the docs, half a page down:

Inserts into a BLACKHOLE table do not store any data, but if the binary log is enabled, the SQL statements are logged (and replicated to slave servers). This can be useful as a repeater or filter mechanism. Suppose that your application requires slave-side filtering rules, but transferring all binary log data to the slave first results in too much traffic. In such a case, it is possible to set up on the master host a “dummy” slave process whose default storage engine is BLACKHOLE


-- 
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice






-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux