Re: db size growing out of control when using clustered Jackrabbit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 07/24/2012 08:58 AM, Gary Webster wrote:
Hello.
Thanks for the response.

There are several 'idle in transaction' on this server/app, but to a
different db/schema.

This is a cluster issue, not a database issue. So if you have an idnle in transaction, then it is affecting your JCR schema as well.
 
OK, how do I track/debug/stop the "idle in transaction"s ?
 
The "repository" (JCR) schema has only a few 'idle', none 'in transaction' .


By "routine maintenance", do you mean autovacuum, or something else?

I mean autovacuum.

I was hoping to find more of a 'root cause' (eg. jackrabbit config) for this issue.
I can't believe that this table is supposed to be getting so big, to even require much vacuuming.


Autovacuum does appear to usually get 'auto-canceled' by a lock.

That is a problem too.

OK, I am trying to find out why this is happening.
 
However, even when it runs successfully, it doesn't seem to help with
this ws_bundle Toast table size.

It won't if you have the above idle in transactions, regardless of database.

Sincerely,

jD


--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC
@cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux