Re: replication_timeout does not seem to be working

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>If no reply is returned from the standby in replication_timeout, the master
thinks
>that the connected standby is inactive, and terminates the replication
connection.
>This is useful for the master to detect a standby crash or network outage. 

After that master commit current transaction with "local" synchronous_commit
or rollback?

And why I setup this parameter replication_timeout = 2s and my wal's thread
(on master and server are restarted within 2s)?

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/replication-timeout-does-not-seem-to-be-working-tp4620827p4726014.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - admin mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux