Glyn Astill <glynastill@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Maybe the docs should be embellished to also say "since a > superuser is automatically considered a member of any group, it > should be taken into account that names with a + mark will affect > all superusers (although this was not the case prior to 9.0)" or > something along those lines. That seems like a good idea to me. I can't help but think that someone, somewhere is going to create a "suspended" role to assign to logins which they want temporarily disabled, put that at the top of pg_hba.conf, and not be amused by the results. When I dig out from under some other issues, I'll put together a docs patch to propose something like the above, if nobody beats me to it. -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
