Re: Index fillfactor changed in pg9?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 01:46:03PM +0100, Glyn Astill wrote:
> Hey Guys,
> 
> Just testing some new hardware on 9.0.3 and have restored one of our dumps from 8.4.7.  What I'm seeing is although table sizes are the same, indexes are a lot bigger, approx 50%.
> 
> I've done a search and so far can't find anything, but have default fillfactors changed? Or is it something else?
> 
> Thanks
> Glyn
> 

Given absolutely zero information, are both platforms the same
number of bits? 32-versus 64-bit? The alignment needs for 64-bit
could result in needing more space. Another alternative is that
the order of data insertion caused a bigger index. What happens
if you run a REINDEX on both DB's to the index sizes?

Regards,
Ken

-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux