Re: Too many WAL(s) despite low transaction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Since the production database is running,  I plan to do now is this

1. Set archive_timeout = 20m (Does the change require db restart to take effect?)
2. Set  autovacuum=on and track_count=on (Does the change require db restart to take effect?)
    Does that mean we are running autovacuum?
3. Run VACUUM FREEZE ANALYZE since bulk loading was done earlier. (Can this be done while the db is active and on production?)

All 3 steps is to lower the WAL files that are being shipped out.

Is this a workable action to achieve the result required?

Please assist.

Thank you.

Regards,

Selvam

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux