Thanks, Alex! I will take a look at your recommendations and keep you posted. Sam On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 03:24, Sam Stearns <samtstearns@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Thanks, Norbert! >> >> I'll run the perl 5.10 upgrade past the guys. >> >> Sam >> >> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Norbert Zacharias <zac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> perl -V >>>> Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 8) configuration: >>> >>> May be an upgrade to 5.10 will solve the problem ? > > Doubtful :-( > >>> From gdb: > >>> #0 0x080bf4ef in Perl_sv_vcatpvfn () >>> #1 0x080bdb30 in Perl_sv_vsetpvfn () >>> #2 0x080a1363 in Perl_vmess () >>> #3 0x080a1d06 in Perl_vwarn () >>> #4 0x080a1fde in Perl_warn () >>> #5 0xfe7f9d58 in pg_warn () from /usr/local/stow/perl-5.8.8/lib/site_perl/5.8.8/i86pc-solaris/auto/DBD/Pg/Pg.so >>> #6 0xfe7c704e in defaultNoticeReceiver () from /usr/local/lib/libpq.so.4 >>> #7 0xfe7cf0bc in pqGetErrorNotice3 () from /usr/local/lib/libpq.so.4 > .... > > So it looks like it you are receiving a notice and DBD::Pg is trying > to warn() it. > > What versions of DBD::Pg and DBI are you using? I'd look at > http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/TURNSTEP/DBD-Pg-2.17.2/Changes and > http://search.cpan.org/~timb/DBI-1.616/Changes for any known bugs you > might be hitting. > > If upgrading those do not fix it, the next step would be to try and > make a reproducible test case. I'd start by by cranking up the > postgres log level so you can find out what the notice is. From there > you might be able to find a way to trigger it reliably. > > If all else fails it never hurts to run it under valgrind to see if it > can pinpoint some obvious memory corruption. > -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
