Re: [HACKERS] locales and encodings Oh MY!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robert Haas <robertmhaas@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> With how similar straight C and en_US.UTF8 are it was suggested to me,
>> by persons who are far more C knowledgeable then I in my office, that
>> this is something the PG community could "fix" . A "fix" being so that
>> "col LIKE 'foo%' " could use btree indexes in locales like en_US.UTF8
>> (and probably some others).

>> is the request unreasonable ? anyone got any idea of the price tag to
>> make that happen ?

> I thought it already did that.

No, and the odds of it ever happening are insignificant.  The sort order
associated with en_US (and other "dictionary order" locales) is just too
randomly different from what you need to optimize a LIKE search.
(Whoever told you en_US sorts similarly to C is nuts.)

The solution if you want the database's prevailing sort order to be en_US
is to put an extra text_pattern_ops index on the column you want to do
LIKE searches on.  We might eventually have the ability to spell that
"put a C-locale index on the column", but text_pattern_ops is the way to
do it today.

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux