Nick <t32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I've not seen anything remotely like that. I wonder what's >> different.... > > I did a test with the same postgres build (and autovacuum_naptime > = 1 as well) on the same OS with only the system databases > (postgres, template0, template1), and after the weekend the memory > utilization was acceptable: That's probably it. Our shop normally has just one application database in a cluster, and I can't think of any clusters with more than three or four. It sounds like there might be some sort of memory leak when a vacuum worker switches databases. -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
