Re: High Availability: Hot Standby vs. Warm Standby

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Rob Wultsch wrote on 09.07.2010 18:14:
I am aware that I can use the 9.0 standby server for read only queries, but
that is (currently) not something we need


Taking SQL backups without impacting the master might be something to consider.

Interesting point. Thanks for mentioning that.

I'm wondering about the differences when the failover situation occurs. From
reading the docs, I get the impression that 9.0's streaming replication
might be faster than 8.4's WAL shipping, but otherwise offers the same level
of data protection.

Is there a difference in how much data could potentially be lost in case of
a failover?

9.0 has streaming replication so much less data would likely be lost.
WAL logs are generally 16 MB and often shipped when completed.

So my assumption is correct that streaming replication does mean that in case of a failover less transactions are lost?
Regards
Thomas


--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux