OK. This happened again on another server with these same settings. I did not see any long running transaction, and the autovacuum launch process was running. > -----Original Message----- > From: Benjamin Krajmalnik > Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 5:22 PM > To: 'Tom Lane' > Cc: Kevin Grittner; pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: Autovacuum stopped running > > # - Cost-Based Vacuum Delay - > > #vacuum_cost_delay = 0ms # 0-100 milliseconds > #vacuum_cost_page_hit = 1 # 0-10000 credits > #vacuum_cost_page_miss = 10 # 0-10000 credits > #vacuum_cost_page_dirty = 20 # 0-10000 credits > vacuum_cost_limit = 10000 # 1-10000 credits > > #---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------- > # AUTOVACUUM PARAMETERS > #---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------- > > #autovacuum = on # Enable autovacuum subprocess? 'on' > # requires track_counts to also be on. > #log_autovacuum_min_duration = -1 # -1 disables, 0 logs all actions > and > # their durations, > 0 logs only > # actions running at least this number > # of milliseconds. > autovacuum_max_workers = 10 # max number of autovacuum > subprocesses > #autovacuum_naptime = 1min # time between autovacuum runs > #autovacuum_vacuum_threshold = 50 # min number of row updates before > # vacuum > #autovacuum_analyze_threshold = 50 # min number of row updates before > # analyze > #autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.2 # fraction of table size > before vacuum > #autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.1 # fraction of table size > before analyze > #autovacuum_freeze_max_age = 200000000 # maximum XID age before > forced vacuum > # (change requires restart) > #autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 20ms # default vacuum cost delay > for > # autovacuum, in milliseconds; > # -1 means use vacuum_cost_delay > #autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit = -1 # default vacuum cost limit for > # autovacuum, -1 means use > # vacuum_cost_limit > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 5:10 PM > > To: Benjamin Krajmalnik > > Cc: Kevin Grittner; pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: Autovacuum stopped running > > > > "Benjamin Krajmalnik" <kraj@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > TO be truthful, I did not check that. > > > I arrived at the conclusion because although I have 10 autovacuum > > > threads, none of the tables had been autoanalyzed or autovacuumed > in > > > hours (and due to the nature of the activity they do so every > > minute). > > > If I ever see this behavior now I know what to check for :) Thx. > > > > We've seen one or two previous reports that suggested that the > autovac > > launcher might have stopped launching workers, but it hasn't been > > reproducible. Are you using any nonstandard parameters for > autovacuum? > > > > regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
