Re: linux standard layout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Thanks all.

I cannot change the decision on vmware or layout, but it's great to know that the rpm way is a valid one.

I appreciate all inputs.



Regards,

Ben Kim


On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Scott Marlowe wrote:

On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Ben Kim <bkim@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear list,

I have about 20 postgresql databases, about 3-4 GB in total.

We are moving them from Solaris/SPARC to a linux based virtual machine.

I don't like the VMWare environment, but it's not my choice, and assuming
the cpu load is ok, will there be any benefits if I put each database on
separate partitions, vs. simply using the one data directory?

What reasoning was given for putting your database server in a
virutalizeed environment?

Also, how is using standard rpm, with its standard layout (/var/lib/pgsql,
/usr/lib/pgsql, ...), generally regarded? ( vs. compiling everything ?) Does
anyone think using the rpm is unprofessional or something that only
beginners will do?

I have someone who opposes the use of standard rpms (even yums) for this
reason. I thought I'd check out how it is received professionally.

Sounds like a religious argument.  I mostly used packages, unless I
can't.  (i.e. two different versions on RH at the same time)

I ask the question because sometimes I feel uneasy mixing rpms and source
compilation.

Worry more about accidentally having two different versions of the
same lib linked to various executables.  It's easy to do with things
like mysql and apache and php and zlib.

If I compile something from the source, sometimes I see a boundary condition
- like, if I already have DBI from a standard rpm, it expects postgresql
library at a certain location - making me wonder whether I should remove the
DBI rpm and compile it also from the source, or whether I should use
standard rpms for postgresql as well. (DBI may not be a good example.)

In general I didn't have any problems yet with standard rpms and I can make
the rpms work if there's a problem, but I may be missing something.

My advice:

put postgresql on its own, powerful, reliable non-virtualized server.
Demand that the person who wants to virtualize it justify their
decision with more than hand-wavy methodologies.  Use packages unless
you're on RPM and you need > 1 version of pgsql.  Even if you need to
compile some tarball against the packages, it's still easier to
maintain than to install it all from source.


--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux