Re: fighting '<IDLE> in transaction'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Scott Marlowe escribió:

> The real issue with idle in transaction isn't locking so much.  A
> simple idle in transaction that just ran a select * from table limit
> 1; will have made it so that vacuum cannot reclaim space that it
> normally could until that transaction is committed or rolled back.

That's not a problem in 8.4 either, because when the select finishes the
snapshot is deleted and vacuum knows that it can remove those tuples.
That's what we have the new snapshot management module for.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux