Re: WAL file compatibility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Steve Crawford <scrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The source and destination servers have to be the same major PG release,
>> same architecture (no 32-bit vs 64-bit for instance), and built with the
>> same configure options.  OS per se shouldn't matter, but you could
>> easily get burnt on configure options if you use binaries obtained from
>> different packagers.  Compare pg_config output or check the fields
>> listed by pg_controldata.

> Out of curiosity, will Pg automatically detect incompatible WAL files 
> and refuse to operate on them throwing the appropriate error or can it 
> appear to work for a while until it suddenly doesn't?

There are checks on the contents of pg_control, not directly on WAL
files, but the system identifier checks should link the two together.

I suspect the largest practical risk is that different OSes might assign
different behaviors to the same locale name.  There's really no good way
for Postgres to detect that :-(

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux