Greg Stark <gsstark@xxxxxxx> writes: > The run-time of CLUSTER doesn't vary very much based on whether the > data is already in index order or not. The number of passes only grows > like log(n) of the size of your data and if you set > maintenance_work_mem large enough (somewhere around 100MB-1GB) the > constants are small enough that you're unlikely to even outgrow a > single pass (plus a final merge though) Uh ... what? It's not based on the sort code, unless someone rewrote it since I looked last. It's an index scan and will definitely depend on the index ordering. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin