Re: vacuum tx id wraparound issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Kevin
Kempter<kevink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> we're inserting an average of 70-100 rows per second into these tables.

Hm. And every row is a separate transaction? That's still only a few
hundred rows per second. About 25 million per day. You should have
about 4 days before it hits autovacuum_freeze_max_age-vacuum_freeze_min_age.

Are you using subtransactions heavily (savepoints in sql or exception
clauses in plpgsql)? That could add a multiplier or two to the number
of transaction ids used up.

You can raise autovacuum_freeze_max_age to, say, 800 million to get
four times longer before the autovacuum kicks in. You can also lower
vacuum_freeze_min_age to maybe 25 million. That will give you about
775 million transaction ids, almost 8x what you have now, which will
hopefully give you about a week before autovacuum tries to freeze the
table



--
greg
http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf

-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux