Security question UNIX Sockets vs CIDR style access
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Subject
: Security question UNIX Sockets vs CIDR style access
From
: Kevin Kempter <
kevink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 09:06:39 -0600
Organization
: Consistent State
Sender
:
pgsql-admin-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent
: KMail/1.11.3 (Linux/2.6.27.24-170.2.68.fc10.x86_64; KDE/4.2.3; x86_64; ; )
Hi All;
I'm looking for thoughts/feedback on the use of UNIX Sockets vs standard CIDR style access (i,e, Ident, MD5, etc) to a Postgres Cluster. What are the pros/cons, which is more secure and why, etc...
Thanks in advance
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Security question UNIX Sockets vs CIDR style access
From:
Chris Browne
Re: Security question UNIX Sockets vs CIDR style access
From:
Andy Shellam
Prev by Date:
Re: ruby connect
Next by Date:
Re: Security question UNIX Sockets vs CIDR style access
Previous by thread:
ruby connect
Next by thread:
Re: Security question UNIX Sockets vs CIDR style access
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[KVM ARM]
[KVM ia64]
[KVM ppc]
[Virtualization Tools]
[Spice Development]
[Libvirt]
[Libvirt Users]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite Questions]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]