Marc Cousin <mcousin@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tuesday 05 May 2009 16:35:11 Tom Lane wrote: >> Hmm ... is it likely that index entries with pathid = 120 are *very* few >> and far between in jobid order? It looks like we have no >> CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS calls inside the loop in _bt_next(), which is >> probably a mistake ... > In fact. there are none, as I had just removed them and I wasn't sure of it, > so I was double-checking before telling my colleagues it was OK :) OK, that explains it then :-(. I'll see about fixing this. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
