Re: getting 'full' names of functions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Tom,

> > I combined your suggestions into this query I'll be using for now:
> 
> > SELECT DISTINCT n.nspname || '.' || p.oid::regprocedure::text FROM
> 
> This is flat *wrong*, as you'll soon find if you are working with
> functions in more than one schema.  regprocedure already puts a
> schema qualification on the name if one is needed.

You are right. I was more concerned with getting the same number of functions as in pgAdmin III. There were two 'missing' because of pg_function_is_visible:

public.plpgsql_call_handler()
public.plpgsql_validator(oid)

They are obviously relicts from an earlier PostgreSQL-version. Could they cause problems if left be although the new versions are now in pg_catalog which obviously is being searched before all other schemata?

But why is regprocedure not just addding the schema to all of the functions then? 

Thank you very much,

Peter
-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01

-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux