Re: strange autovacuum behaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefano Nichele escribió:
> Hi All,
> I have a couple of questions about autovacuum/vacuum behavior.
>
> On my production system, I set autovacuum ON since it's pretty hard to
> me find a good timeframe for vacuum (the system is pretty busy over the day)
> Last week the system was really slow and running vacuum manually the
> performance was really improved.
> So now I would like to understand why autovacuum did not work as
> expected (at least for me). Any ideas ?

Maybe the autovacuum naptime was set too high.  Or perhaps the threshold
and scale settings were too high.  Maybe the vacuum_cost_delay for
autovacuum was too high.

> Why autovacuum (that was OFF) started ?  For preventing transaction ID
> wraparound ? Is it right that in such case all the tables are
> (auto)vacuumed ?

Not necessarily all tables; only those that require a vacuum to prevent
xid wraparound.  (It was all tables in 8.1, but this changed in 8.2).

-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux