Re: Not so simple query and a half million loop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



No one knows why I got "actual time=0.014..0.570 rows=30 loops=511222"
and "actual time=0.005..0.006 rows=1 loops=15158976"?

With:
 cu.cal_user_type = 'u' AND
 cu.cal_recur_date = COALESCE((SELECT cd.cal_start FROM egw_cal_dates
icd WHERE icd.cal_id = cd.cal_id AND icd.cal_start = cd.cal_start AND
icd.cal_start <> 0), 0)
 ~ 450 seconds

With
 cu.cal_user_type = 'u'
 ~ 130 ms

With
 cu.cal_recur_date = COALESCE((SELECT cd.cal_start FROM egw_cal_dates
icd WHERE icd.cal_id = cd.cal_id AND icd.cal_start = cd.cal_start AND
icd.cal_start <> 0), 0)
 ~ 1 second

I've tryied to increase statistics to maximum, with no success.

This is the eGroupware database schema, with a few records.

Regards,

2008/12/1 Daniel Cristian Cruz <danielcristian@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Maybe someone would like to see it without broken lines (I do).
>
> Regards,
>
> 2008/12/1 Daniel Cristian Cruz <danielcristian@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> I've tryied 4 times to post this message to pgsql-performance without
>> success... No return, even an error...
>>
>> Below is my problem; a query that perform bad when using a filter almost equal.
>>
>> ...
>
> --
> Daniel Cristian Cruz
> クルズ  クリスチアン ダニエル
>



-- 
Daniel Cristian Cruz
クルズ  クリスチアン ダニエル

-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux