Re: Change in logging behaviour between 8.1 and 8.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Arrrghhh, it was was actually 10 (not that it really makes any difference), should have actually waited for file to unzip before posting!!!

Ben Webber wrote:
Sorry, meant 2 gigs, not 10.

An interesting suggestion, but the problem with storing the logfiles in
a table for us would be that uncompressed, the log file for a day is
about 10 gigs. This would mean that an unacceptable amount of excess
data would accumulate in the database. It would be feasible however to
write a script to import the archived logfile into a new temporary
database on a different server, then use SQL to search it and delete the
db when finished.

Thanks for the suggestion though.

Ben.



Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Ben Webber wrote:
Hi,

I wrote a shell script to find the duration and the related statement in the log file and place them one after the other if the duration is over a specified time like this:-

2008-10-31 02:00:49 GMT [23683] [mp_live] LOG:  statement: CLUSTER;
2008-10-31 02:04:42 GMT [23683] [mp_live] LOG: duration: 232783.684 ms

I wonder if you'd benefit from doing CSV logs and then storing them into
a table.  Querying using SQL is probably going to be easier (and more
robust -- it'd work even with embedded newlines etc).




This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc. www.surfcontrol.com


--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux