Re: Deleting old archived WAL files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 16:17 -0400, Chander Ganesan wrote:

> Why?  If you haven't saved a backup that you made previously (using 
> pg_start_backup()), having archived wal files is useless.  I don't see
> why you just don't arbitrarily remove them immediately.
> 
> WAL files are useful when you have a "starting point" (i.e., a backup 
> made using the PITR backup method), and a set of WAL files generated 
> "after" the starting point. If you don't preserve the start point
> (i.e., the PITR backup) then the WAL files are basically useless.

They are still better than nothing at all. I haven't read the whole
thread, but suggesting deleting things like that makes me go all
twitchy. :-). Do a couple of proper backups and then delete em.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support


-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux