Re: postgresql is slow with larger table even it is in RAM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



May I ask, do you have any indeces or a primary key on that table?

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:06:25 +0530
"sathiya psql" <sathiya.psql@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Dear Friends,
>      I have a table with 32 lakh record in it. Table size is nearly 700 MB,
> and my machine had a 1 GB + 256 MB RAM, i had created the table space in
> RAM, and then created this table in this RAM.
> 
>     So now everything is in RAM, if i do a count(*) on this table it returns
> 327600 in 3 seconds, why it is taking 3 seconds ????? because am sure that
> no Disk I/O is happening. ( using vmstat i had confirmed, no disk I/O is
> happening, swap is also not used )
> 
> Any Idea on this ???
> 
> I searched a lot in newsgroups ... can't find relevant things.... ( because
> everywhere they are speaking about disk access speed, here i don't want to
> worry about disk access )
> 
> If required i will give more information on this.


-- 
Üdvölettel,

Czuczy Gergely
Harmless Digital Bt
mailto: gergely.czuczy@xxxxxxxxxxx
Tel: +36-30-9702963

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux