Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom Lane wrote:
Geoffrey <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
I would avoid 8.3 without extensive testing. 8.2.6 is likely a better
shot a minimizing one off incompatibilities.

We are in a very similar situation in that we are looking to migrate from 7.4 to 8.3. So seeing Scott's and Joshua's responses, I'm not sure if we should go with 8.2 or 8.3.

7.4 to 8.2 isn't exactly a trivial jump either; there are enough
incompatibilities that could bite you if you don't test your
applications.  I don't think JD's argument above holds water.
What does hold water is the observation that 8.3 is still at 8.3.0
(though not for much longer) and has certainly got more bugs today
than recent 8.2.x releases.  That should equalize out by, say,
middle of the year.  So if you intend to go to production in the
next month or two then 8.2.x is a safer bet.  If your release
timeframe is a bit longer, then 8.3.x would be a good choice because
it will perform better and be supported longer.  You'd want to be
sure you were on 8.3.latest before going live of course.

Thanks Tom, that's the kind of feedback I was looking for. We know we've got quite a bit of testing ahead of us with our move to 8.3, so I suspect that by the time we go live, it will be 8.3.1 or more.

--
Until later, Geoffrey

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
 - Benjamin Franklin

--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux