On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:13:59 +0100 Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Le Tuesday 05 February 2008 22:35:11 Tom Lane, vous avez écrit : > > The reason there isn't one is it doesn't need one; it's an > > implementation detail not a user-visible feature. , Although it is an implementation detail it is certainly a very user-visible detail. It can and will affect how people design their databases to take advantage of the implementation detail. > > So how do you want us to handle the users questions about how HOT is > good for them and who'd like to have some insights of its inner > working, but don't want to properly learn the internals of PostgreSQL > implementation? We need to write a one page mini-HOWTO on taking advantage of HOT and HOTs limitations. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
