Re: Recovering a database in danger of transaction wrap-around

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 02:10:06PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> > I used lsof to monitor which files the backend was actually working on.  It
> > took two of the four days for it to vacuum a single table with 43
> > one-gigabyte extents.  I have one table with over 300 extents.  I'm looking
> > at a vacuum process which can ultimately take weeks (if not months) to
> > complete.
> 
> Yipes.  You are just using plain VACUUM, right, not VACUUM FULL?
> Have you checked that vacuum_cost_delay isn't enabled?

pg_dump/pg_restore may be a lot faster here - we're in an emergency
situation anyway and after that, the whole DB will be clean again, all
indices rebuilt nicely, no bloat in the tables.

Tino.

-- 
www.craniosacralzentrum.de
www.spiritualdesign-chemnitz.de

Tino Schwarze * Lortzingstraße 21 * 09119 Chemnitz

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux