based on your report, run time of OR is 0.275 ms and IN is 0.314
Perhaps if we run explain verbose to see the actual query plan
medi
On Dec 12, 2007 2:36 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1Well a simple test:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:25:16 -0800
"Medi Montaseri" <montaseri@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this is not exactly admin related, but ... it is simple enough
> to be even fun
>
> From a performance point of view, is it better to use OR as in
> SELECT expr FROM expr WHERE col=this OR col=that OR col=theOther
> Or to use a range of values as in
> SELECT expr FROM expr WHERE col in ( val1, val2, ...., valn)
>
> I think the IN range yields a better query plan .... what do you
> think ? Thanks
postgres=# explain analyze select * from tellers where bid in ('1','2');
QUERY
PLAN
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on tellers (cost=0.00..10.25 rows=20 width=352) (actual
time=0.019..0.192 rows=20 loops=1) Filter: (bid = ANY
('{1,2}'::integer[])) Total runtime: 0.314 ms (3 rows)
postgres=# explain analyze select * from tellers where bid = '1' or bid
= '2'; QUERY PLAN
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on tellers (cost=0.00..11.50 rows=20 width=352) (actual
time=0.018..0.199 rows=20 loops=1) Filter: ((bid = 1) OR (bid = 2))
Total runtime: 0.275 ms
(3 rows)
postgres=#
> Medi
- --
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHYGJwATb/zqfZUUQRAs32AJ9HuJVcY5gcr0hboxkI6PcRtv++JwCfXd00
nQ7Frkof0mVwqNYVxQ9Vziw=
=XzJi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----