On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Jeff Frost wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Jeff Frost <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Why does it request it twice?
I think the reason is that the rollforward cycle is
fetch next segment into RECOVERYXLOG
process segment
unlink RECOVERYXLOG
and only when the "fetch" step fails does it realize it's done. So then
it has to figure out which segment it wants to start extending and fetch
that into the real name of the segment.
We could probably rejigger this to avoid a duplicate fetch in common
cases, but I'm worried that we couldn't guarantee it in every case ---
edge cases like the last valid xlog record ending right at a segment
boundary might be trouble. If the recovery script has to handle the
situation sometimes, it's probably best to make it do so on a regular
basis ---
That all seems reasonable enough. Is it in the docs somewhere? I didn't
find anything like this mentioned. If not, could we get it added as a note?
would you like to have only found out about this when you were
trying to revive your database at 4AM?
Oh, definitely not! But then again, that's why I was testing it. :-) I just
wish the guy who came before me and wrote the script had tested it. But, no
big deal, I'll just update the script to deal with it.
As always, thanks Tom! I'll report back if that's the fix.
Sure enough, commenting out the mv fixes the problem. Now everything starts
up just fine. So, I'll have to re-engineer the script not to do that.
Thanks again Tom!
--
Jeff Frost, Owner <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/
Phone: 650-780-7908 FAX: 650-649-1954
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
