Re: Deletes hurt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 09:14 -0700, Jim Nasby wrote:
> I'm currently doing EnterpriseDB training at a well-known  
> entertainment company. I found out something yesterday that I thought  
> the community would find interesting...
> 
> In their game (MMORPG) databases, they have fields on all their  
> tables that indicate whether a record has been deleted or not. I've  
> seen this done before, typically for data retention reasons. But they  
> had a daily process that went through each night and physically  
> deleted the records that had been marked as deleted.
> 
> The reason they weren't actually deleting rows real-time is because  
> it cost to much in Oracle to do so. My guess is it's because Oracle  
> has to copy the entire deleted row to the undo log as part of the  
> delete, which would be pretty costly.

I believe it has more to do with the cost of removing each row from the
index, which might then require parent uplink updates also, which is a
major source of contention. DB2 type 2 indexes deliberately avoid that
issue, and opt for an approach that requires an offline utility to clear
up afterwards. Sounds like a great plan to me...

-- 
  Simon Riggs             
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux