"Glen W. Mabey" <Glen.Mabey@xxxxxxxx> writes: > What I see is a bunch of stuff related to the Acquisitions table, > including a relation for the primary key, which was created back when > the table was named "Acquisition" (not plural), and two different views > which draw on Acquisitions, both of which appear to be fully > functional. I wonder whether "reindex index pg_class_relname_nsp_index" would make this go away. regards, tom lane
