Tom Lane wrote:
> Zach Bagnall <zach.bagnall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> Seriously though, the PITR recovery mechanism is quite mature and usable.
>
>> I would say it is a good start - and progress is clearly being made. But
>> it wont be "usable" for most serious applications until we have
>> per-database transaction logging and backup recovery.
>
> Don't hold your breath; that's not even on the agenda, much less
> something that's likely to appear soon. If you need separable recovery
> then run a different postmaster instance for each database.
I would have to concur... if you need such a feature I would wonder why
you are running multiple databases within the same cluster at all.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
