Re: CLUSTER using more memory than expected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 10/25/06, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

CLUSTER will eat maintenance_work_mem during index rebuilds --- more or
less.  You shouldn't expect these numbers to be dead on, particularly
not in older releases.  It looks like your 2Gb spec has turned into
3.6Gb actually eaten, which is a bit sloppier accounting than I'd like
but not overly surprising.  (FWIW, I think CVS HEAD is better than 8.0
at measuring sort workspace.)

                        regards, tom lane

Thanks for the clarification.  It doesn't sound like it's going to jump to 8Gb and hog most of the RAM.


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux