Re: postgres in HA constellation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> 
> I think this highlights exactly what I'm trying to emphasise: in
> actual, shared-nothing systems like this, there's no possible
> guarantee of "never".  There are possible guarantees of "very
> rarely".  The problem is, you're already trying to address a teeny
> portion of the likely events on your machines.  So you have to assume
> that more than one thing might break at the same time, and have a
> recovery plan for it.  I submit that a recovery plan of "restore from
> pg_dump" is usually not going to be enough if it was worth the cost
> and hassle of setting up shared disk failover.  YMMV, of course.
> 
yes, I did a restore from a dump with pg_dump, that took over a day. maybe I 
can speed it up a bit, but this is going to take too long.


Sebastian



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux