Re: Addendum on stored procedure array limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You might want to try 8.2 beta then, as support for NULLs in arrays was
just added. Testing of that magnitude would be great!

On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:08:19PM -0400, Paul B. Anderson wrote:
> There are definitely nulls in there, and in the fields where the error 
> is signaled.  I missed in my reading that they are not allowed.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 06:13:04PM -0400, Paul B. Anderson wrote:
> >  
> >>I'm running RHEL 3.0 and postgreSQL 8.1.4, compiled from source.
> >>    
> >
> >Have you tried enforcing that there's no NULLs in the arrays? That code
> >is pretty new (in fact, I thought it was only in 8.2...), so it's
> >possible that therein lies the bug.
> >
> >I'd also look into the size of the varchars... if they're big enough you
> >could be hitting a memory limit somewhere.
> >
> >In any case, the error message could certainly use improving... :)
> >  

-- 
Jim Nasby                                            jim@xxxxxxxxx
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux