Re: best OS and HW for postgreSQL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hi,

yep :~) 
compiled from source on Suse 9.2 (not SLES 9)

best regards

Hakan 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-admin-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ray Stell
> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 5:03 PM
> To: Scott Marlowe
> Cc: Jim Nasby; Raul Retamozo; pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] best OS and HW for postgreSQL
> 
> 
> 
> I'm curious about the "[ADMIN] COPY FROM command v8.1.4" thread
> as it applies to this thread.    The COPY thread pointed to kernel
> issues in x86_64 GNU/Linux SLES 9.  I'm wondering if x86_64 is not
> a good move for pg servers at this time.   Are there happy x86_64
> production deployments?
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:44:32AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 20:18 -0400, Jim Nasby wrote:
> > > 
> > > In general, you're probably best off running whatever OS 
> you're most  
> > > comfortable with.
> 
> ---------------------------(end of 
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match
> 


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux