adey <adey11@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I apologise if I am uninformed, but it is my understanding that REINDEX is > still required even with the most regular of vacuums? REINDEX shouldn't be required at all under normal circumstances. regards, tom lane
adey <adey11@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I apologise if I am uninformed, but it is my understanding that REINDEX is > still required even with the most regular of vacuums? REINDEX shouldn't be required at all under normal circumstances. regards, tom lane
|