Re: transactoin id wraparound problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:23:01PM -0700, Sriram Dandapani wrote:
> Thanks
> 
> Is there a way to monitor  vacuum progress. Can I resume normal
> operations assuming vacuum will update the transaction ids or should I
> wait till it finishes.

That depends on how many transactions you think will happen while
vacuum is running.  If it's a lot, you could pass the fatal point (==
you lose data) before vacuum finishes.  In most cases, it's probably
ok, but only you can decide how dangerous it would be for you to lose
data.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary
and imaginative work need not end up well. 
		--Dennis Ritchie


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux