Re: Restore of pg_dump taking a long time...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On May 24, 2006, at 2:56 PM, Todd A. Cook wrote:

Tom Lane wrote:
"Todd A. Cook" <tcook@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
I have found that increasing maintenance_work_mem can decrease index
build speed on large tables:
You should probably re-measure when 8.2 comes out; we've fixed a number
of performance issues in the sorting code that might cause that.

Thanks.  I'll do that.  If I can, I'll try it sooner on a build
from CVS.

If you'll be messing around with CVS, you might also want to try this patch: http://jim.nasby.net/misc/pgsqlcompression/compress-sort.patch (which was written by someone else). It hacks compression into the on- disk sort code, which has shown a 50% speed improvement on my machine. It should be fine to use for loading a database, but you wouldn't want to leave it in for serious use (IIRC there's some cases it flat-out doesn't handle right now).

You could probably apply that to 8.1.4 as well if you wanted to; it should be fine for just loading the database.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux