Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 17 May 2006, Jeff Frost wrote:

On Wed, 17 May 2006, Tom Lane wrote:

Did you try generating a test case using a long sleep() as a replacement
for the archive_command script?  If there is a PG bug here it shouldn't
be that hard to expose it in a simple test case.  I'm up to my armpits
in other stuff and don't have time to try it myself...

Interesting that you should say that as I had just started setting up a test. I seem to get alot of these:

May 17 21:34:04 discord postgres[20573]: [4-1] LOG: archived transaction log file "000000010000000000000001" May 17 21:34:04 discord postgres[20573]: [5-1] WARNING: could not rename file "pg_xlog/archive_status/000000010000000000000001.ready" to May 17 21:34:04 discord postgres[20573]: [5-2] "pg_xlog/archive_status/000000010000000000000001.done": No such file or directory

I'm guessing that the archiver moves the WAL file to <wal filename>.ready, and successful completion, it renames it to <wal filename>.done?

Oh, except that they are 0 bytes, so they must be just status files. Nevermind on that question. :-)


--
Jeff Frost, Owner 	<jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Frost Consulting, LLC 	http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/
Phone: 650-780-7908	FAX: 650-649-1954


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux