Jeff Frost <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, 15 May 2006, Tom Lane wrote: >> No, I can't see what the connection should be there. It's supposed to >> be designed so that the archive command can take its sweet old time and >> nothing happens except that a backlog of WAL files builds up in pg_xlog. > That's what I thought, but that doesn't seem to be what I'm observing. Of > course the NAS device only gets wedged about once every month or two, so it's > difficult to reproduce. If it's really a PG bug, it should be trivial to reproduce: put a long sleep in the archive-command script. regards, tom lane
